#Flightgear how to fly the cessna simulator#
#Flightgear how to fly the cessna download#
#Flightgear how to fly the cessna mac#

This allows you to play Microsoft Flight Simulator on both Intel, Apple Silicon M1 and M2 Macs.

#Flightgear how to fly the cessna mac#

Can You Play Microsoft Flight Simulator On Mac?Ĭan You Play Microsoft Flight Simulator On Mac?Īlthough Microsoft Flight Simulator is not available for Mac, you can play Microsoft Flight Simulator on a Mac using Xbox Cloud with Xbox Game Pass Ultimate – even if you don’t have an Xbox.And be sure to spend some time tweaking it (activating atmospheric light scattering, manually setting the shaders to high values, setting the weather for detailed, etc.). In FG, all aircraft are default aircraft basicallyīut yeah, give it a try and see if it's for you. In the end of the day, we can't compare FG aircraft with projects like PMDG, created by a group of several paid people during several months that will cost you more than the sim you fly. About the FDM, some aircraft have better flight dynamics than others, and I believe some are very nice to fly. Surely you are right about some of the issues FG has. This is partially because of the active development of the C172, but also because FG has truly some very nice features. I use both FlightGear and X-Plane 10, but lately I find myself using FlightGear more. For instance, we do have volumetric grass around airports and an addon named FGcamera which works similarly to Ezdok in My pleasure! Also, FlightGear has an excellent wiki and an excellent forum with very friendly people, and there you will find an array of new features yet to be implemented in a major release.

#Flightgear how to fly the cessna download#

If you have the machine capable of, please do turn the Atmospheric Light Scattering ON, use custom shaders and move all sliders to the right individually, use TerraSync to download the newest available scenery for your area, use random buildings, add more density to trees and clouds, etc. Some stuff isn't just on by default (we want people with low end computers to be able to run it). Here is how the default panel looks like:Īlso, keep in mind that FlightGear is like any other complex flight simulator which needs a lot of tweaking. I am now working with a team to improve the default Cessna 172 and we are reworking all textures, the 3D model, adding realistic procedures, adding knobs, buttons, etc. And as CyberMike pointed out, helping the community is the best way to get good looking results. It depends on the plane, and they are all getting better. Give FG3.4 a try and I think you may be pleasantly surprised!įG is nice but the planes look terrible.are there any fsx/xp10 devs supporting FG? The VC for the 777 is awful. Also, a bunch of guys (myself included) are working on some huge improvements for the cockpit of the default Cessna 172.

And the 777 is said to be really realistic and looks better with each release (but too complex to me). The Cessna 337 is really nice, also the DR400 and the Cap10, and the new Extra 500 is looking gorgeous. But that is just details, and it should only get better with future releases.Īnd as for planes, there are some very amazing ones. Also the contours of cities, forests, the path of rivers, coastlines, they often have too little resolution for my taste. The resolution of the mesh (that is, the information about elevation) is not very high, so mountains sometimes look like pyramids. This is miles ahead of other sims.įG's main problem, in my opinion, is with its scenery.

And the ALS system is gorgeous, the sky looks better than any other sim with dynamic change of colours according to haze, sun position, weather, etc. I can only fly in clear days on my computer.). As much as I like to fly X-Plane 10 as well, it is amazing to be able to fly with tons of clouds in the sky or even in a complete overcast and rainy day without having a drop in performance (try that with X-Plane clouds. For instance, the weather engine (in advanced mode) takes into consideration the terrain layout when generating a weather pattern, so mountains, sea, etc., influence the weather. In my view, FlightGear had some huge leaps in quality in the past year or so, it has some really stunning features.

I believe that is the 777, but I may be mistaken (I rarely fly large jets).